A Major Physics Experiment Just Found Hints of ‘Sterile’ Particles That Shouldn’t Exist
A major physics experiment has detected a ‘ghost particle’ that shouldn’t exist.
Dubbed the ‘sterile neutrino’, the mysterious particle passes through matter without interacting with it at all.
The particle was first spotted in the mid-1990s in an experiment that left scientists baffled. However, until now, the result of that experiment couldn’t be replicated
If the latest study is confirmed, it could transform the foundations of particle physics.
It could also help solve cosmic mysteries like the existence of dark matter – an unidentified substance that makes up roughly 27 percent of the universe.
Neutrinos are one of the most abundant particles in the universe. As you read this, trillions of neutrinos are traveling through your body.
The particles have almost no mass and rarely interact with matter, meaning they are unlikely to have any impact on the particles of your body, and earning them the ‘ghostly’ description.
As waves of neutrinos pass through space, they will periodically ‘oscillate’ — switching back and forth between one ‘flavor’ and another.
Physicists have already identified three ‘flavor’ of neutrino: muon, electron, and tau – but in recent decades, several scientists have hypothesized about the presence of a fourth type of particle, the ‘sterile neutrino’.
Discovering an additional form of neutrino could help to explain the mysterious origins of dark matter.
‘That would be huge; that’s beyond the standard model; that would require new particles … and an all-new analytical framework,’ Kate Scholberg, a particle physicist at Duke University told LiveScience.
The hypothetical sterile neutrino has mass, according to the researchers, different from the other types.
Along with this, it interacts only gravitationally, making it extremely difficult to detect.
But, it can be ‘caught’ by observing its influence on the other types of neutrinos.
This is what happened during an experiment at MiniBooNE (Mini Booster Neutrino Experiment) at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab), located near Chicago.
The MiniBooNE experiment involved firing beams of muon neutrinos at an oil tank.
Some of those neutrinos oscillated into electron neutrinos, which produced flashes of light that researchers were able to record using detectors inside the oil.
The oscillation rate is predictable, so even a few extra electron neutrinos would be a result.
The researchers saw 2,437 interactions, about 460 more than predicted.
WHAT IS A ‘STERILE’ NEUTRINO?
The sterile neutrino is a hypothetical fourth type of neutrino.
So far, there are three known types of neutrinos, known as ‘favors’.
These are muon, electron, and tau.
A fourth type would have mass – different from the others – and interact with gravity.
Studies have suggested it can be ‘caught’ by observing its influence on the other types of neutrinos.
Most recently, researchers working on the MiniBooNE (Mini Booster Neutrino Experiment) in Chicago believe they observed neutrinos oscillating into sterile neutrinos, and then back to particles in the detectable realm.
If discovered, the sterile neutrino could help to explain the mysterious origins of dark matter, and even resolve the issue of the universe’s matter and antimatter imbalance.
The results mirror those seen in the Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND), an experiment at the now-decommissioned Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico back in the mid-1990s — the only other experiment which has detected the presence of sterile neutrinos.
‘We have two very different detectors…and we have the same results,’ MiniBooNE physicist En-Chuan Huang said.
Both experiments found more neutrino detections that are possible to explain with the Standard Model’s description of neutrino oscillation, researchers claim.
Researchers working on the MiniBooNE believe neutrinos are oscillating into hidden, heavier, sterile neutrinos which are impossible for the detector to identify before they oscillate back into the detectable realm.
The latest findings brought the MiniBooNE team to a 4.8 sigma result when ‘discovery’ in particle physics demands five-sigma.
If these results are confirmed, it could help to explain the existence of dark matter.
Like the hypothesized sterile neutrinos, dark matter only appears to interact with regular matter via gravity.
This shared trait is why sterile neutrinos are one of the most plausible candidates for dark matter.
Although dark matter has never been directly observed, scientists are confident that it exists, predominantly because of the gravitational effects it appears to exert on galaxies in our universe.
Dark matter, which is invisible to light and other forms of electromagnetic radiation, would explain a number of inconsistencies in the observable universe.
For example, the Standard Model suggests stars on the fringes of a spinning, spiral galaxy should travel slower than those located close to the galactic centre, where visible matter is more concentrated.
However, in reality, observations have shown stars orbit more or less the same speed – regardless of where they are found in the spiral galaxy.
Scientists believe the gravitational effects of an unseen mass, slowing the speed of the stars at the edge of the spiral galaxy, could explain the perplexing phenomenon.
Identifying the particle that makes up dark matter would be a monumental discovery.
According to Professor Scholberg, if the LSND and MiniBooNE were the only neutrino experiments undertaken on Earth, scientists would be updating the Standard Model to include some sort of sterile neutrino at this very moment.
However, the problem is that other major neutrino experiments have not detected the same anomaly that both LSND and MiniBooNE have observed.
WHAT IS DARK MATTER?
Dark matter is a hypothetical substance said to make up roughly 27 percent of the universe.
The enigmatic material is invisible because it does not reflect light, and has never been directly observed by scientists.
It cannot be seen directly with telescopes, but astronomers know it to be out there because of its gravitational effects on known matter.
The European Space Agency says: ‘Shine a torch in a completely dark room, and you will see only what the torch illuminates.
Dark matter is a hypothetical substance said to make up roughly 27 per cent of the universe. It is thought to be the gravitational ‘glue’ that holds the galaxies together (artist’s impression)
‘That does not mean that the room around you does not exist.
‘Similarly, we know dark matter exists but have never observed it directly.’
Dark matter is thought to be the gravitational ‘glue’ that holds the galaxies together.
Just five percent the observable universe consists of known material such as atoms and subatomic particles.
As recently as last year, the IceCube particle detector at the South Pole failed to turn up any evidence for sterile neutrinos.
Researchers working in Antarctica performed two independent analyses which determined with 99 percent certainty that the eV-mass sterile neutrino does not exist.
Francis Halzen, a University of Wisconsin-Madison professor of physics and principal investigator for the IceCube Neutrino Observatory, said: ‘Like Elvis, people see hints of the sterile neutrino everywhere.
‘There was this collection of hints, and theorists were convinced it exists.’
After analyzing roughly 100,000 neutrino events at the IceCube particle detector at the South Pole (pictured above) in search of the ‘sterile neutrino,’ scientists working on the project concluded that no such particle exists
It is possible the anomaly detected in the LSND and MiniBooNE could be the result of the way neutrinos interact with the experimental setup, which is not yet not understood.
However, it is entirely possible researchers working at particle detectors around the world will now have to explain why their experiments are failing to produce evidence of the sterile neutrinos which are being spotted in Fermilab and Los Alamos Lab.
‘There are people who doubt the result,’ Professor Scholberg said, ‘but there’s no reason to think there’s anything wrong [with the experiment itself].’
If that’s the case, scientists may have to revise their entire understanding of the universe.
You May Like This